Manish Sisodia Granted Bail by Supreme Court

“Travesty of Justice”: Manish Sisodia Granted Bail by Supreme Court, Slams Delays in Liquor Policy Case

Manish Sisodia Granted Bail by Supreme Court

In a significant verdict, the Supreme Court of India has granted bail to Manish Sisodia, former Deputy Chief Minister of Delhi, nearly 18 months after his arrest by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in connection with the alleged liquor policy case. The Supreme Court’s ruling emphasized the fundamental right to a speedy trial and criticized the prolonged incarceration without a confirmed trial date. This landmark judgment has sparked widespread reactions, both from political circles and the public.

Background of the Case

Manish Sisodia was arrested by the CBI on February 26, 2023, and subsequently by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) less than two weeks later. The charges against him relate to the alleged irregularities in the Delhi liquor policy. Despite the seriousness of the charges, the lengthy period of pre-trial detention has raised concerns about the violation of his fundamental rights.

Supreme Court’s Verdict

In a powerful statement, the Supreme Court bench comprising Justice BR Gavai and Justice KV Viswanathan highlighted that Sisodia’s right to liberty, guaranteed under the Constitution, cannot be undermined. The court criticized the lower courts for denying bail and remarked that forcing Sisodia to “work his way back up the system” would be akin to making him “play snakes and ladders.”

The court further emphasized that in matters of “life and liberty of a citizen,” it is unacceptable for an individual to be made to run “from pillar to post.” The bench stated, “Incarceration of 18 months… Trial not having even commenced and appellant has been deprived of right to a speedy trial.”

Key Observations by the Supreme Court

The Supreme Court made several critical observations during the hearing, particularly targeting the delays in the trial. The court noted that keeping Manish Sisodia behind bars for an “unlimited time” without a trial was a violation of his fundamental rights. Justice Gavai questioned the prosecution’s readiness, pointing out that with 493 witnesses named in the case, there was no realistic possibility of the trial concluding in the near future.

The court also dismissed the argument that Sisodia might tamper with evidence, highlighting that most of the evidence was documentary and already in the possession of the investigative agencies.

Implications of the Bail Order

The Supreme Court’s order granting bail to Manish Sisodia is significant not only for the accused but also as a reminder of the judicial system’s commitment to upholding individual rights. The court stressed that “bail is the rule, jail an exception,” reaffirming the principle that pre-trial detention should not be used as a form of punishment.

The bail comes with conditions, including the surrender of Sisodia’s passport and a requirement to report to the Investigating Officer every Monday. The court also warned that any tampering with evidence would result in his return to jail.

Reactions to the Verdict

The verdict has been widely welcomed by the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) and its supporters. Rajya Sabha MP Raghav Chadha expressed his joy on social media, calling the verdict a “victory of truth” and lauding Sisodia as the “hero of the Delhi education revolution.” Similarly, Punjab Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann described the bail as a triumph of justice, echoing the sentiment that the truth has prevailed.

Critical Remarks on Lower Courts

The Supreme Court’s judgment also included critical remarks about the handling of the case by the lower courts. The court questioned the rationale behind the Delhi High Court’s decision to deny bail in May, which was based on concerns that Sisodia might influence witnesses or destroy evidence. The Supreme Court’s observation that “in matters of liberty, every day counts” served as a stark reminder of the importance of timely justice.

Conclusion

Manish Sisodia’s release marks a turning point in the ongoing liquor policy case, underscoring the judiciary’s role in safeguarding individual rights. The Supreme Court’s ruling is not just a victory for Sisodia but also a significant affirmation of the principle that justice delayed is justice denied. As the legal proceedings continue, the focus will remain on ensuring a fair and speedy trial for all involved.

Read More :- Stree 2 Movie 2024 : review, Release Date

FAQs

  1. Why was Manish Sisodia arrested?
    • Manish Sisodia was arrested in connection with alleged irregularities in the Delhi liquor policy.
  2. What did the Supreme Court say about his prolonged detention?
    • The Supreme Court criticized the prolonged detention without a trial, stating it violated Sisodia’s fundamental right to a speedy trial.
  3. What are the conditions of Sisodia’s bail?
    • Sisodia must surrender his passport, report to the Investigating Officer every Monday, and avoid tampering with evidence.
  4. How did AAP react to the verdict?
    • AAP leaders and supporters hailed the verdict as a victory of truth and justice.
  5. What is the significance of the Supreme Court’s ruling?
    • The ruling reinforces the principle that bail is the rule and jail an exception, emphasizing the importance of protecting individual rights.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *